This blog is about competition. Not just sports, or games, or politics, or economics, or decision-making, or relationships, but possibly about any or all of these things. It will use examples from current events to illustrate broader ideas. Or so I hope. It begins at the start of 2012.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

12-03-10 250 to one


It seems likely that regardless of the resolution of this bitter primary fight, one loser will be the caucus system, simply because it is not terribly fair.  Consider these results (calculated by CNN, delegate numbers do not match the total because some delegates are not automatically assigned).

Wyoming Results
Candidate
Votes
Delegates
Votes/Delegate
Romney
822
13
63.2
Santorum
673
7
96.1
Paul
439
4
110
Gingrich
165
1
165
Other
9
0
n/a
Total
2108
29
72.7

Ohio Results
Candidate
Votes
Delegates
Votes/Delegate
Romney
456513
35
13043
Santorum
446225
19
23486
Gingrich
175554
0
n/a
Paul
111238
0
n/a
Total
1189530
66
18023

Thus, a vote cast in Wyoming is worth 250x as much as a vote in Ohio.  This is especially bad given that Ohio is a swing state, and Wyoming is not.  Just for fun, consider that Guam had 215 votes cast (207 for Romney, 8 uncommitted and none for anyone else!) and assigns 9 delegates, for a ratio of 23.9 votes/delegate.

Thus, the Republican Party (who determines the delegate distribution) appears to have decided that they care about each Guam voter (who cannot even vote in the general election) as much as 750 Ohio voters.

No comments:

Post a Comment